×

Message

EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

View e-Privacy Directive Documents

View GDPR Documents

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.

OCIMF’s Ship Inspection Report Programme (SIRE) was originally launched in 1993 to specifically address concerns about sub-standard shipping. It is one of OCIMF’s most significant safety initiatives and in 2005 barges and small vessels were incorporated into the SIRE programme.

The SIRE programme is a unique tanker risk assessment tool of value to charterers, ship operators, terminal operators and government bodies concerned with ship safety. Participation in the SIRE programme is on an entirely voluntary basis and the programme has established itself as a major source of technical and operational information to prospective charterers and other programme users.

The SIRE system is a database of up-to-date information about tankers and barges. Essentially, SIRE has focused tanker industry awareness on the importance of achieving satisfactory tanker quality and general ship safety standards. Since its introduction, this voluntary SIRE Programme has received industry-wide acceptance and participation by OCIMF members, programme recipients and ship operators. OCIMF is in no doubt that better informed vetting decisions are leading to improvements in the quality of ships, accelerating its continuing drive for safer ships and cleaner seas.

The SIRE programme is underpinned by a database of up-to-date information. Since its introduction, more than 180,000 inspection reports have been submitted to SIRE. Currently there are over 22,500 reports on over 8000 vessels for inspections that have been conducted in the last 12 months. On average, programme recipients access the SIRE database at a rate of more than 8000 reports per month.

FS 55482

SIRE 2.0

Developed alongside industry and the OCIMF membership, the new and updated Ship Inspection Report Programme, SIRE 2.0, will future proof the tanker inspection process in line with evolving risks, technology and expertise.

The digitalised inspection programme will transform how inspections are conducted and will support industry efforts to continuously enhance safety.

The SIRE 2.0 programme is predicated on a uniform inspection protocol that comprises the following:

  • The pre-inspection element – This element consists of information provided by the operator through the following:
  • The Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ)
  • The Pre-Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ)
  • The Certificate Repository
  • The Photograph Repository
  • The Inspection Declaration
  • The Inspection element – This element consists of the following phases:
  • The pre-boarding phase, and
  • The physical Inspection phase.
  • The Report Element – This element requires the inspector to verify the accuracy of all information entered in the inspection editor during the pre-boarding and physical inspection phases. The inspector is then required to check the spellings and grammar of all comments and negative observations, validate the inspection and finally submit the inspection dataset to the SIRE report database.


Inspection reports

Inspection reports are available for download from the report index for a period of 12 months from the date of receipt and are maintained in the database for 2 years. SIRE access is available, at a nominal cost, to OCIMF members, bulk oil terminal operators, port authorities, canal authorities, oil, power, industrial or companies which charter tankers/barges as a normal part of their business. It is also available, free of charge, to Governmental bodies which supervise safety and/or pollution prevention in respect of oil tankers/barges (e.g. port state control authorities, MOUs, etc). Applicants wishing to participate in the SIRE Programme are required to obtain formal applications and are asked to submit their request via email.

SIRE 2.0 Training Videos

OCIMF has developed a series of short training videos as part of its commitment to provide ongoing support for inspectors, officers, crew, vetters and operators. These videos will help stakeholders develop a clearer understanding of the inspection programme and of the processes within a SIRE 2.0 inspection.

Human Factors Technical

Factsheets for Industry

Find out more about the key aspects of the inspection process and reporting outcomes delivered through the digitalised, updated and enhanced SIRE 2.0 tanker inspection regime in the factsheets below.

Resources for Programme Users

The resources below are aimed at supporting Programme Participants, Programme Recipients, Vessel Operators and Inspectors in their understanding of SIRE 2.0.



169.3 KB
Programme user guide to SIRE 2.0 documents

This overview indicates which guidance documents are applicable to each programme user group, but it is advisable to review all documents for full familiarisation.



395.1 KB
SIRE 2.0 Conditions of Participation Policies and Procedures

This guidance document provides comprehensive instructions and essential information for all SIRE 2.0 participants, including submitting companies, vessel operators, inspectors, and programme recipients. It outlines the key policies, procedures, and processes.



967.8 KB
SIRE 2.0 Ergonomic Guidance for using an Inspection Tablet

This document provides advice on using tablets ergonomically, including images of how to carry tablets and accessories, guidance on mitigating identified ergonomic risk factors, and potential solutions to these issues.



70.7 KB
SIRE 2.0 VIQ7 Inspection Management Process Comparison

This easy-to-use Excel spreadsheet provides insight into each task and compares VIQ7 and SIRE 2.0 procedures. It also includes useful links to guidance documentation.



217 KB
SIRE 2.0 Rules for use of the Tablet Camera and Voice Recorder

This document provides clear guidance and rules for the use of the Tablet Camera and Voice Recorder.



270.2 KB
SIRE 2.0 Draft Inspection Report Validation Best Practice

The document’s purpose is to guide submitting companies on best practices for reviewing and validating SIRE 2.0 draft inspection reports prior to their publication in the SIRE 2.0 programme database.



3.7 MB
SIRE 2.0 Inspection Management Processes Submitting Company

The document guides submitting companies on inspection management processes, including inspection requests, accepting requests, allocating inspectors, compliance reports, inspection cancellations, resubmissions, withdrawal of inspection reports, and audit history.



4 MB
SIRE 2.0 Inspection Management Processes Vessel Operator

The document guides vessel operators through inspection management processes, including inspection requests, operator input, inspection cancellations, pre-inspection declarations, inspection resubmissions, and inspection publishing.



10 MB
SIRE 2.0 Inspection Management Processes Inspector

The document guides inspectors through inspection management processes, including tablet editor, capturing observations, media options available on the tablets, tracking of and contingency inspections, partial paper-based inspections, incomplete inspections, and inspection resubmissions.



1 MB
SIRE 2.0 Instructions for entering data into the Suggestions for Improvement portal

The document provides information on the Suggestions for Improvement (SFI) Portal and step-by-step instructions on how to access it.



464.4 KB
SIRE 2.0 Inspection Report Format

This gives information on the inspection report format and captured information, including vessel and operator particulars, CVIQ questions completed by inspectors and unvalidated PIQ responses



244.7 KB
SIRE 2.0 Universal Interpretations

This document gives information on advanced training and evaluating crew performance so that a potential charterer can better understand what a vessel operator has done to maintain and monitor standards onboard.



146 KB
SIRE 2.0 Question Library Question Programming Attributes

This Excel spreadsheet provides a library of questions (including HVPQ or PIQ) that could be asked and the correct response to each question.



2.7 MB
SIRE 2.0 Paper-Based Contingency Process Instructions for Submitting Companies and Inspectors

This document provides step-by-step guidance on the paper-based contingency process, which can be completed onboard in cases where a tablet cannot be used, including partial paper-based inspections, online editors, incomplete inspections, and report changes.



253 KB
SIRE 2.0 Inspection Opening Meeting Checklist

This is a step-by-step guide on what is required from the inspector/quality assessor, the master, officers, and other staff when introducing themselves, the format of the meeting and a useful checklist.



239.3 KB
SIRE 2.0 Inspection Closing Meeting Checklist

This is a step-by-step guide on what is required at the closure of the meeting, explaining the observation declarations and a useful checklist.



1.4 MB
SIRE 2.0 Negative Observation Module Explanation

Any non-compliance identified during inspections should be recorded in the inspection editor. This document provides insight into the negative observation module and the classification of a subject of concern (SOC) and nature of concern (NOC).



6.5 MB
SIRE 2.0 Instructions for Uploading Photographs to the Photograph Repository

This is a step-by-step guide on how to upload photographs and a defined list of photographs required. The inspector uses the images to verify the condition and insert them in the final report.



1.1 MB
SIRE 2.0 Instructions for Completing the Pre-Inspection Questionnaire

A guide on how to complete a Pre-Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ). In combination with the HVPQ, this will ensure appropriate questions are assigned to each inspection, additional information is given to inspectors during inspections and a more detailed inspection report is produced.



631.9 KB
SIRE 2.0 Instructions for Uploading Certificates to the Certificate Repository

This provides step-by-step instructions on how to upload certificates to the certificate repository version as well as a list of specific vessel certificates that must be uploaded.



102.7 KB
SIRE 2.0 to VIQ7 Comparative Analysis

This Excel document provides a comparative analysis of the differences between SIRE 2.0 questions and the VIQ7 questions.



3 MB
SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 2: Chapters 8 to 12

This document lists questions that might be asked during SIRE 2.0 inspections focusing on cargo and ballast systems, mooring and anchoring, machinery spaces, general appearance and conditions, and ice operations.



3.7 MB
SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 1: Chapters 1 to 7

This document lists questions that might be asked during SIRE 2.0 inspections focusing on vessel, operator, and inspection specifics, certification, crew management, navigation, communication, safety management, pollution prevention, and maritime security.



203.3 KB
SIRE 2.0 Programme Introduction and Guidance

This guide informs all SIRE 2.0 Programme participants (stakeholders) of how the inspection process has been designed and the expectations for its implementation.

Frequently Asked Questions and Glossary of Terms

Additional information and guidance is availabile in the Frequently Asked Questions and Glossary of Terms section.



There are restrictions on who can qualify to receive SIRE reports. The SIRE Programme is required to operate under the programme guidelines which have been filed with the European Commission and the Federal Trade Commission.

The guidelines stipulate the following non-OCIMF Members who can qualify for programme output:

Bulk oil/gas terminal operators, oil, power, industrial or oil trader companies which in-charter ships/barges as a normal part of their business, Governmental bodies which supervise safety and/or pollution prevention in respect of ships/barges(e.g. port, canal and State Authorities), inspection reports, vessel/barge particular questionnaires and vessel index listings can be electronically downloaded to the users computer using the internet.
Full OCIMF Members (£45 per report) Recipient (Non-Members) (£55 per report). If the report is to be forwarded to a 3rd Party Vetting Agent, a supplement will be payable of £10 per report. Full OCIMF Members downloading more than 1,000 tanker reports receive 30% discount on total cost. Barge reports, members & non-members £20 per report. VPQs, BPQs and index downloads are free of charge.


If there are questions after reviewing the API integration documentation here:

Sire 2.0 API Access

please contact the Support desk via email, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
There is no connection between the SIRE 2.0 Programme and Q88.
The OCIMF bowtie risk assessment process was used to risk rank and categorise all SIRE 2.0 Questions into either core or rotational. Each inspection will be compiled to include all core questions and a selection of rotational questions applicable to a vessel to be inspected.

OCIMF does not perform any datamining or analysis of inspection data to identify concerns within any individual company fleet. The inspection compiler algorithm does not consider past inspection performance of an individual vessel or a fleet of vessels when generating a Compiled Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (CVIQ). It considers information provided by the vessel operator through the Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ) and Pre-Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ) when selecting the pool of questions that will be used by an inspector for any given inspection.

OCIMF will undertake analysis of anonymised inspection data for its internal use only to evaluate the effectiveness of the SIRE 2.0 inspection programme and identify inspection trends and emerging concerns, which could inform the development of industry best practices and SIRE 2.0 Campaign questions.

One of the benefits of SIRE 2.0 is the data provided through purchased SIRE 2.0 reports will enable report recipients to undertake considerable analysis of an operator’s managed fleet, if they wish to do so.
OCIMF has ranked each SIRE 2.0 question using risk assessment models (also known as ‘bowties’) developed in collaboration with the OCIMF membership. The ranking process determines how a question will be managed and allocated within the inspection programme. Questions which are identified as being Core, i.e., related to significant risks onboard a vessel as defined by OCIMF members, will be assigned to all inspections where the question is relevant to the vessel being inspected, whilst questions identified as being Rotational, i.e., not related to a significant risk as defined by OCIMF members will be allocated on an occasional basis.

Whilst OCIMF has used a bowtie risk assessment model to determine whether questions are Core or Rotational, the end user of a report must make their own determination of relative risk posed to their organisation by each question based on their own evaluation of a question and its supporting guidance.
The Quality Assessors are responsible for the day-to-day assessment and verification of the quality of all facets of the OCIMF programmes, including Programmes Participants and third-party contractors. They play a vital role in the development, implementation, and continuous improvement of OCIMF policies and procedures under SIRE/BIRE and OVID – monitoring and reporting on the effectiveness of the rules governing the programmes.

Quality Assessors are recruited based on their extensive seafaring experience. They provide a diverse and balanced mix of SIRE, BIRE and OVID inspectors, vetting experts, human factors and other relevant skills. They have also been given bespoke training by OCIMF to fully equip them for the role.
Human factors within SIRE 2.0 inspections are explained from different stakeholder perspectives in SIRE 2.0 Training Videos – Human Factors available on the website.
Inspectors must not endanger their own safety, or that of others, by conducting any inspection related activities without adequate rest hours. OCIMF will audit and enforce compliance with its policies and procedures that are applicable to all SIRE 2.0 programme participants, including inspectors.
OCIMF set up an engagement forum for all companies who had integrated their IT systems with the SIRE web services to provide support, and share information, experience, and expertise on SIRE 2.0 IT integration. A dedicated mailbox was set up to enable effective routing and timely resolution of queries.

OCIMF also issued guidance materials to Programme Recipients.
The four key focus areas of SIRE 2.0 are Accuracy, Capability, Reliability, and Adaptability.
Some of the measures that will support these key areas are:

• The SIRE 2.0 Question Library – All questions and their supporting guidance have been rewritten to provide well defined expectations around how they should be prepared for by the vessel crew and answered by the inspector. See SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 1 Chapters 1 to 7, SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 2 Chapters 8 to 12

• SIRE 2.0 Policies and Procedures have been drafted to ensure that all aspects of the inspection process are well described and defined.

• Quality Assessors have been engaged to monitor and audit all aspects of the inspection process so that weaknesses and non-conformities can be identified and addressed.

• Inspectors have received comprehensive technical and non-technical skills training in preparation for the SIRE 2.0 Programme rollout.

• An inspector Continuous Professional Development Programme has been developed to provide ongoing training, support, and evaluation for each inspector.

• The inspection tablet provides significant data to permit the monitoring of how an inspection is conducted by the assigned inspector. Analysis of inspection data will permit undesirable behaviours to be identified and corrected.

• The inspection booking process has been updated to permit enhanced analysis of inspection activity globally. The OCIMF Quality Assurance team will be able to identify and follow up on poor inspection management practices by vessel operators, submitting companies and inspectors.
OCIMF has developed an inspection compiler which uses an algorithm to create a bespoke Compiled Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (CVIQ) for each vessel inspection.
The SIRE 2.0 Programme does not include barges. Report recipients will be responsible for ensuring that personnel assigned to review inspection reports on their behalf have sufficient skill and knowledge to evaluate the content.
An inspector will be required to verify that a vessel operator has completed:
• Onboard superintendent inspections declared through the PIQ by reviewing inspection reports generated in accordance with TMSA3 12.1.2
• Onboard comprehensive specialist audits declared through the PIQ by reviewing audit reports generated in accordance with TMSA3 4.4.5, 5.2.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.1, 6.4.2, and 6A.4.3
SIRE 2.0 has standardised the operator response categories. There are no plans to offer a standard root cause analysis tool, except for human-based negative observations, although this may be a consideration for future improvement.
One of the key objectives of SIRE 2.0 is to align SIRE and TMSA. TMSA mainly considers shore-based management, whereas SIRE 2.0 mainly considers ship-based management.


To connect via Wi-Fi Direct, you will need to ensure the printer is not connected by cable to the network and enable Wi-Fi Direct mode in your printer. Please refer to the printer manufacturer’s support page for details.
Each tablet is provided with a carrying case and strap so that an inspector can keep their hands free and the tablet secure while moving around the vessel. See Tablet Comfort Guide, SIRE 2.0 Ergonomic Guidance for using an Inspection Tablet
OCIMF does not supply a touchscreen pen with the tablet.
OCIMF does not supply a bluetooth keyboard and mouse with the tablet. If an inspector wishes to connect their own devices this is easily done.
• In the short term the inspector can complete a booked inspection using the full paper-based contingency process, see SIRE 2.0 Technical Training Videos (Module 8), providing the submitting company commissioning the inspection approves.

• The process for repairing or replacing a damaged or lost tablet is detailed in the Inspector Tablet Purchase Agreement.
The inspection editor will autosave the inspector's responses periodically to permit the reinstatement of an inspection at a point just before the software or hardware freezes.
The Ex-Rated Ruggedized Tablet is accredited to operate with the following protection type IP68 dust-/waterproof | MIL-STD-810H | usable from -20 °C to +60 °C
OCIMF has engaged with a globally recognized MDM specialist provider. An Enterprise-class product has been selected by one of the world-leading platform providers, Microsoft InTune, together with a robust patch management strategy which will be governed by the OCIMF Secretariat.
The inspection tablet needs to be connected to the internet using Wi-Fi before an inspection to allow inspection data to be transferred from the OCIMF server to the tablet, and then again once the inspection has been validated and is ready for submission to OCIMF. The inspection editor software does not need to be connected to the internet during the physical inspection.


The CVIQ will be generated as soon as a vessel operator declares that the photoset, certificates and PIQ have been completed. Vessel operators and Submitting Companies should plan and book inspections whilst considering the needs of the SIRE 2.0 inspection programme. They should coordinate to ensure that the vessel operator declaration is made not less than 48 hours prior to the planned inspection.
Negative observations raised against Core questions will be carried forward to the next inspection for the inspector's information when considering the same question. The observations will be displayed in the Operator Supplied Content tab. The information will not be carried forward to the inspection report and the inspector is not required to make any comment relating to the previous negative observation unless the situation that gave rise to the negative observation was still present and unresolved.
An inspection is assigned to an individual inspector by a submitting company based on a set of compliance rules.
The SIRE 2.0 inspection process necessitates that the vessel operator and submitting company consider the preparatory work required by the inspector when requesting or accepting an inspection.

The standard set of photographs should be updated if those on the SIRE 2.0 database are no longer representative of the vessel’s condition. It is recommended that photographs are updated at approximately six-month intervals.

It is recommended that a vessel operator has all pre-inspection work completed before they request an inspection so the inspection booking process is not delayed while the necessary information is provided. The certificate repository and Pre-Inspection questionnaire must be updated before each inspection.
The conditional SIRE 2.0 Questions that may be included in a CVIQ are part of the SIRE 2.0 Question Library. The conditionality that results in a question being included in the pool of applicable questions for any given vessel is provided in the SIRE 2.0 Question Library: Question Programming Attributes document, available on our website.

Conditional questions will be generated based on the operator’s responses to various HVPQ and PIQ questions. If inaccurate declarations are made these may result in a conditional question being included in the CVIQ, and may result in a negative observation to the conditional question.
The upload of certificates and photographs and completion of the Pre-Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ) takes approximately several hours for each ship. Once the initial upload has been completed, maintenance of information required for an inspection will require less effort on each occasion since the data is maintained within the SIRE 2.0 account for each vessel.


The inspector will complete the inspection report as they progress the inspection using the inspection editor software. All negative observations will need to be written up prior to the closing meeting. The inspection editor software will collate all negative observations into a PDF document called the “Observation Declaration”, which can be printed onboard using a ship’s wireless printer.

The Inspector will discuss the negative observations recorded during the inspection with the Master who will have the opportunity to provide additional evidence which may result in the inspector modifying an observation should the circumstances merit this.

A finalised Observation Declaration can then be printed and signed by both the Master and the Inspector. All changes to observations are recorded by the inspection editor software.
The inspection editor software will record the following:
• The date and times of all interactions with an active inspection both before and after a physical inspection.
• The date, time and GPS position of the start, suspension, resumption, and completion of a physical inspection.
• The date and times of all observations recorded (positive and negative) during a physical inspection.
• The step count of an inspector during a physical inspection.
No – comments are required when certain responses are provided – the inspection editor software gives a clear indication where this is required. Inspectors are free to add comments where they consider doing so will add value to the report. All comments supporting negative observations and human observations that exceed expectations must be completed while onboard and presented in the closing meeting. Other comments can be added after the inspector has left the vessel.
Yes.
The submitting company will see the inspection report as soon as the inspector completes and submits the inspection report to them.
A vessel operator will see the inspection report once the submitting company has validated it and released the report to the vessel operator for their comments.
The vessel operator will have 14 days to add their comments to the inspection report before they either release the report for publication or the report is published automatically without operator comments.
SIRE 2.0 has been designed to enable inspectors record observations objectively. Observations will be supported by objective evidence and using a defined set of PIFs to further inform and provide context on the observations.
The SIRE 2.0 process requires that the inspector observes officers and crew performing their normal day-to-day activities.

There are SIRE 2.0 questions which require the inspector to interview officers and crew on aspects of their duties which may not be undertaken during the inspection, such as the use and demonstration of Life Saving Appliances (LSA) or Fire Fighting Appliances (FFA). Inspectors will consider the seniority of an officer or crew member when interviewing or requesting a demonstration from any individual.

Officers and crew should expect to be interviewed by the inspector on any of their duties which are covered by the SIRE 2.0 Question Library.
Inspectors have been trained to better understand the impact the inspection has on crews, understanding the importance of language and choice of words, and are mindful of the impact their interactions can have with crew members.

Crew nervousness and fear are a significant performance influencing factor (PIF) in their own right. Sometimes, this may be due to the inspection itself, or perhaps it may be a pre-existing factor amongst a crew. But in either case, where it is evident during an inspection, this is something that should be recognised and reported by the inspector. So yes, the intention is that SIRE 2.0 might help address this.
The Submitting Company decides whether to accept a night-time or non-discharge operation inspection request from a vessel operator.

The individual report recipient, in accordance with their internal vetting policies and processes, decides whether to accept a non-discharge operation inspection report.
Most of the inspection report will be completed during the physical inspection. However, the inspector will still be required to do a quality check to make sure that their spelling and grammar is correct and to enter additional detail that they feel is necessary for accuracy and completeness. The validation and submission of the report will take place after an inspector has left a vessel.
No. Inspectors will select the most appropriate PIF from a prescribed drop-down list made available to them in the SIRE 2.0 response tool.
SIRE 2.0 encourages a move away from a snapshot yes/no approach to providing richer, more meaningful insight that can be acted upon. It will ensure observations are given context and will result in more detailed, reliable, granular and comparable marine assurance data, helping the report recipient better understand how well a vessel is managed based on a qualitative assessment and not the number of observations.


SIRE 2.0 provides the vessel operator with the opportunity to provide operator comments to all negative observations before the inspection report is published. The Submitting Company and/or a Programme Recipient is responsible for contacting the vessel operator if they require further information. The SIRE 2.0 programme does not include any requirement or process for an inspector to review and comment on operator comments appended to an inspection report.
The report can be amended up until the time it is submitted. All changes to the report before, during and after the physical inspection are tracked.
All reports available in the database are valid, but it is up to the Programme Recipient purchasing the report to decide whether a particular report meets their requirements or their use of the programme. OCIMF’s role is to make the report available for 12 months.
No. There is no requirement for an inspector to record a minimum number of positive (or negative) observations. An inspector is required to report accurately and completely on what is observed during an inspection.
The vessel operator has 14 days to provide their initial operator comments for each negative observation from the day the inspection report is released by the submitting company.

The vessel operator may continue to add subsequent comments once an inspection report has been published, normally 12 months.
The term positive observation in the context of SIRE 2.0 specifically refers to an observation that an observed person’s (OP) demonstration or explanation of a task exceeded normal expectations. These observations can be easily identified in the final inspection report as the comment text is green to highlight them and the negative observation comment text is red.
The hardware and process response tools do not have positive observations as defined above.

A full explanation of the response tools can be found in the OCIMF document SIRE 2.0 Programme: Introduction and Guidance, found on our website.


Where a terminal prohibits the use of the tablet camera, but there is no restriction on the use of the tablet itself, the camera function can be demonstrably disabled.


It is recommended that photographs are refreshed by the vessel operator at approximately six-month intervals. However, they must be refreshed whenever the condition of the vessel materially changes. Photographs can remain in the SIRE database for up to a year without being refreshed if the vessel operator is confident that they remain representative. It is the responsibility of the vessel operator to ensure that the photographs uploaded to the SIRE 2.0 vessel photo repository remain representative of the vessel’s true condition as near enough to the time of the inspection.
The identification of best practice is best left to individual vessel operators and their internal programmes.
OCIMF has many publications which include industry best practice gained from a wide variety of contributors within its membership and the industry. In many cases the guidance to SIRE 2.0 questions is based on best practice and the principal objective of an inspection is to verify that a vessel is being operated in alignment with existing industry best practice and statutory requirements.
It is the vessel operator’s responsibility to ensure that up to date photographs are uploaded to the OCIMF SIRE 2.0 vessel photo repository before an inspection is booked. A negative observation will be recorded if a photograph is not uploaded by the vessel operator. The absence of photographs will be visible to the report recipient who will form their own opinion on whether to accept the vessel.
The details of the standard set of photographs are provided in the OCIMF document SIRE 2.0 Instructions for Uploading Photographs to the Photograph Repository available on the website.

The SIRE 2.0 photo repository provides a sample photograph for each standard photograph location.
Inspectors should be guided by OCIMF document SIRE 2.0 Rules for the use of the Tablet Camera and Voice Recorder available on the website.
An inspector is expected to provide a photograph to support a negative observation wherever this will add value to the report.
The final inspection report includes all the photographs the inspector has uploaded with the inspection report package.

Any photographs taken during an inspection but not uploaded with the inspection report package are automatically deleted from the inspection tablet once the final inspection report is published.

The inspector cannot export the photographs or use them for something else.


Yes. Inspectors are required to undergo quality assessments by Programmes Quality Assessors who work exclusively for OCIMF. The actual interval of the assessment/appraisal may change depending on the performance of individual inspectors.


An on-line OCIMF database holding electronic copies of vessel trading certificates and documents, provided by the vessel operator.
A unique, vessel-specific set of questions compiled for each vessel inspection.
Questionnaire for documenting and communicating permanent and infrequently changing information relating to a vessel, its construction, outfitting and certification.
OCIMF software that uses algorithms to select questions from the SIRE Question Library to create a unique vessel-specific VIQ for each inspection.
A declaration, made by the vessel operator that all data, photographs, and certificates provided in connection with a SIRE inspection are accurate, complete and in accordance with the instructions provided.
An OCIMF proprietary software application loaded onto the Inspection Tablet that allows an inspector to gather and record information during an inspection, including photographs, and create a SIRE report.
A dedicated, intrinsically safe tablet computer used by the inspector solely to complete a SIRE inspection.
Performance Influencing Factors is a collective term for those factors that are known to influence or shape human performance. They can enhance and assist human performance, or they can degrade and obstruct it.
An on-line OCIMF database holding photographs of vessels, provided by the vessel operator.
An on-line questionnaire, completed by the vessel operator, providing information about the vessel, and supplementing the Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ).
· Core – Minimum questions required to meet the fundamental risk assessment criteria, as defined by OCIMF.
• Rotational – A non-core question assigned to a vessel on an occasional basis.
• Campaign - A new (or existing rotational) question assigned to every inspection for a fixed period in response to an incident or industry trend.
• Conditional – A question assigned to verify an aspect of a vessel’s operational history or operator’s oversight activities of the vessel.
An OCIMF database containing all current inspection questions.
An OCIMF database containing all applicable data collected by the inspector during an inspection.